As an extension of my previous post about the new Mac lineup I did a quick analysis of the cost per performance of the current entire range of Macs.
Spoiler: The Mac Mini still wins.
Method
- Select each Mac in the current lineup
- Choose each available CPU option
- Keep every other option (RAM, HD, etc) as base
- Note the price
- Head over to Geekbench Results Browser
- Take the average of the 5 most recent results for Geekbench 64-bit for each machine
Notes:
- I only evaluated single processor Mac Pros. Beyond that we are getting costs beyond the ‘typical’ consumer.
- I was unable to find a Geekbench64 for the 2.7GHz i7 Mac Mini. However, a 32-bit value was available. So the value shown below is an approximation of what the 64-bit value would be based on the typical change in i7 processors.
- All processors are dual core except where noted as Qi7 or Qi5, which are quad core. The 6Xeon Mac Pro is 6 core.
Keep in mind this analysis is entirely focused on CPU/Memory performance. While not really representative of overall performance, which is likely far more dependent on hard drive and network speeds, this is the best apples-to-apples comparison we can do across the whole lineup.
Results
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4d6ac/4d6ac1e358ee54d4ebfe69d3a754e32dd82186a6" alt=""
In my experience above around 9,000 will be more than adequate for most uses. Almost half the current lineup hits that mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ec6ee/ec6ee92f0942827110e687ffc2f79c6cfdff9c44" alt=""
The Mac Mini is the clear winner in value for money. Even if you consider that you’d need your own monitor. At almost 50% better performance for cost.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e9018/e90189545053f8cd1a8fda6b93d12e733c897456" alt=""